HOW TO USE THIS ONLINE MAGAZINE
by clicking the arrows at the side of the page.
by clicking anywhere on the page. A slider will appear, allowing you to adjust your zoom level.
and move the page around when zoomed in by dragging the page.
and return to the original size by clicking on the page again.
by entering text in the search field and click on "In This Issue" or "All Issues" to search the current issue or the archive of back issues
a PDF of this magazine.
by clicking on thumbnails to select pages, and then press the print button.
a page via email, Facebook, Twitter and more.
TO VIEW PREVIOUS EDITIONS
, click the
button at the bottom of the screen.
Beyond the Bale : June 2019
For some decades, regenerative land managers have claimed that their production practices have led to regeneration of the environment and biodiversity, and that this has enabled them to generate a strong and stable level of farm profit and increased wellbeing. Individual case studies have supported this. However, a unique study released in March, titled Graziers with better profitability, biodiversity and wellbeing has now examined the differences in profitability between 15 commercial-scale regenerative wool and/or beef graziers (in regions of eastern Australia where box gum grassy woodlands are found) and conventionally farmed sheep, sheep-beef and mixed cropping- grazing businesses in their regions. In summary, the study concluded that regenerative grazing can be at least as profitable, and at times more profitable, than other methods, whilst increasing the graziers’ wellbeing. The study found that the regenerative graziers are often more profitable than comparable contributors to the ABARES Farm Survey, especially in dry years; that their average levels of farm profit were similar to the Holmes Sackett AgInsights average benchmarks, although less profitable than the top 20%; and the regenerative graziers experience significantly higher than average wellbeing when compared to other NSW farmers that have contributed to the University of Canberra regional wellbeing survey. STUDY RESULTS: FARM PROFIT AND COSTS OVER 10 YEARS • The average profit levels of the regenerative graziers were consistently higher (12 out of 14 years) than the average ABARES Farm Survey participants and showed less variability over the study period. • The average profits of regenerative graziers were consistently better in years where there was low rainfall. The study noted that 11 of the past 15 years had some degree of deficit in rainfall from long term averages and were classed as “unfavourable”. • The average profit levels from the regenerative graziers were comparable with the Holmes Sackett average producers. REGENERATIVE GRAZIERS ARE PROFITABLE AND HAPPY A new report shows that regenerative grazing practices can be very profitable and improve farmer wellbeing, at the same time as increasing the health of Australia’s grassy woodlands. Average net profit/DSE for the regenerative graziers was just below the average of the Holmes-Sackett sample for Wool Flocks and above the average for Beef Herds. • When the regenerative graziers ranked their goals, the most important financial goal was to “achieve a satisfactory level of income”, as opposed to the goal of “maximizing income” that scored significantly lower. Interestingly, the regenerative graziers were able to achieve a level of profit comparable to industry benchmarks as a by-product of their approach to land management. • The regenerative managed farms had substantially lower cost structures, in key areas such as supplementary feed costs/DSE, pasture costs/DSE and animal health and breeding costs/DSE. STUDY RESULTS: FARMER WELLBEING • The regenerative graziers had significantly higher wellbeing than other comparative farmers. • They had significantly higher levels of general health compared to other farmers of similar age. • They had greater confidence in their ability to achieve farming goals, cope with difficult conditions on farm, and were more satisfied with their future security. • When they self-assessed their farm’s financial performance, they were more likely than other farmers to report being satisfied with their farm financial performance, and to report having very good cash flow. This project was supported through funding from the Australian Government's National Environmental Science Program and was conducted by the Australian National University, University of Canberra and University of Queensland researchers and economists, Vanguard Business Services’ agricultural consultants and economists from NSW State Government and ABARES. MORE INFORMATION The full report and summary reports are available on the Vanguard Business Services' website at www.vbs.net.au CASE STUDIES In the latest three editions of Beyond the Bale, AWI has provided case studies of the following NSW woolgrowers whose regenerative agriculture practices are increasing their profitability, while also making their properties more resilient to drought. COLIN SEIS ‘WINONA’, GULONG The property of Colin Seis on the Central Tablelands of NSW is coping with the drought better than a lot of other farms in the region, which he attributes to his pasture cropping, rotational grazing, maintenance of ground cover and perennial grassland. View the case study at www.wool.com/seis CHARLIE & ANNE MASLIN ‘GUNNINGRAH’, BOMBALA The focus of the Maslins on the Southern Tablelands of NSW has been to look after the land, evaluate what it has to offer and then attempt to stock it accordingly. As well as introducing rotational grazing, they have lifted ground cover and improved the water cycle so when it rains there is very little run off. View the case study at www.wool.com/maslin TIM WRIGHT ‘LANA’, URALLA By introducing time- controlled rotational grazing of their livestock and focusing on native pastures, Tim from the Northern Tablelands of NSW has regenerated his landscape and business – increasing productivity while reducing inputs costs, despite long periods of reduced rainfall. View the case study overleaf and at www.wool.com/wright ON FARM 31